home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- On Fri, 13 Jan 1995, stud.ass. wrote:
-
- > I guess it depends on what you're making MARP for. If it is
- > intended to be a pure AMOS replacement
-
- Not really... I want to make it much better..
-
- > (with maybe an Amos2C translator thrown in),
-
- This will definately be included... but it is not a high
- priority... I am taking a course on Compilier Design this semester
- and we have to design a Pascal Compilier... and I plan to co-develop
- an Amos2marp translator at the same time...
-
- >I guess you would have to stick to the way
- > Amos does it (which I believe is method 1 for screens and 2 for
- > icons). However, if it is the ease of use of Amos you're after, you
- > might as well go for the most consistent choice (might be the same
- > one, I don't know). Maybe you could find out if there's any
- > (design) filosofy behind the way Francois did it.
- >
-
- This were I couldn't make up my mind... thats why I asked for some
- help...
-
- thanks for the response
-
- mike
-
- > Branko Collin
- > bcollin@mpi.nl
- >
- >
- >
-
-